Skip to content

Actions: apache/datafusion

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
2,500+ workflow runs
2,500+ workflow runs

Filter by Workflow

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Event

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Status

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Branch

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Actor

⌥ + click/return to exclude
[EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #65644: Issue comment #24704 (comment) created by alamb
1s
1s
[EPIC] Use blocked / chunked memory management in hash aggregation Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #65643: Issue comment #24704 (comment) created by pmoust
1s
1s
feat(physical-plan): add staged execution boundary contract Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #65642: Issue comment #25798 (comment) created by alamb
1s
1s
perf: speed up DictionaryArray hashing Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #65641: Issue comment #26159 (comment) created by alamb
1s
1s
perf: speed up DictionaryArray hashing Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #65640: Issue comment #26159 (comment) created by alamb
1s
1s
fix: skip HashJoinExec nodes carrying dynamic filters in JoinSelection Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #65639: Issue comment #26123 (comment) created by siddubakka
1s
1s
Detect breaking changes - Comment Detect breaking changes - Comment #10335: completed by adriangb
10s
10s
fix: skip HashJoinExec nodes carrying dynamic filters in JoinSelection Datafusion extended tests #19396: Pull request #26123 synchronize by siddubakka
Action required siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
Action required
fix: skip HashJoinExec nodes carrying dynamic filters in JoinSelection Large files PR check #43499: Pull request #26123 synchronize by siddubakka
Action required siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
Action required
fix: skip HashJoinExec nodes carrying dynamic filters in JoinSelection Dev #82170: Pull request #26123 synchronize by siddubakka
Action required siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
Action required
fix: skip HashJoinExec nodes carrying dynamic filters in JoinSelection Dependencies #25141: Pull request #26123 synchronize by siddubakka
Action required siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
Action required
fix: skip HashJoinExec nodes carrying dynamic filters in JoinSelection CodeQL #17706: Pull request #26123 synchronize by siddubakka
Action required siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
Action required
fix: skip HashJoinExec nodes carrying dynamic filters in JoinSelection Rust #80348: Pull request #26123 synchronize by siddubakka
Action required siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
Action required
fix: skip HashJoinExec nodes carrying dynamic filters in JoinSelection Detect breaking changes #11150: Pull request #26123 synchronize by siddubakka
Action required siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
siddubakka:fix-join-selection-dynamic-filter
Action required
fix: skip HashJoinExec nodes carrying dynamic filters in JoinSelection Labeler #39762: Pull request #26123 synchronize by siddubakka
8s
8s
date_bin: define the semantics of negative strides Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #65638: Issue comment #25856 (comment) created by alamb
2s
2s
fix: reject date_bin strides that are not positive Assign/unassign the issue via `take` or `untake` comment #65637: Issue comment #26070 (comment) created by alamb
6s
6s
fix: do not extract common subexpressions from the arguments of an aggregate with a FILTER Detect breaking changes #11149: Pull request #26184 synchronize by adriangb
5m 7s pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
5m 7s
fix: do not extract common subexpressions from the arguments of an aggregate with a FILTER Large files PR check #43498: Pull request #26184 synchronize by adriangb
42s pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
42s
fix: do not extract common subexpressions from the arguments of an aggregate with a FILTER Dev #82169: Pull request #26184 synchronize by adriangb
53s pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
53s
fix: do not extract common subexpressions from the arguments of an aggregate with a FILTER Datafusion extended tests #19395: Pull request #26184 synchronize by adriangb
1s pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
1s
fix: do not extract common subexpressions from the arguments of an aggregate with a FILTER CodeQL #17705: Pull request #26184 synchronize by adriangb
1m 47s pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
1m 47s
fix: do not extract common subexpressions from the arguments of an aggregate with a FILTER Rust #80347: Pull request #26184 synchronize by adriangb
21m 59s pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
21m 59s
fix: do not extract common subexpressions from the arguments of an aggregate with a FILTER Dependencies #25140: Pull request #26184 synchronize by adriangb
4m 44s pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
pydantic:cse-aggregate-filter-args
4m 44s
fix: do not extract common subexpressions from the arguments of an aggregate with a FILTER Labeler #39761: Pull request #26184 synchronize by adriangb
11s
11s